New Recommendations for Food Labelling Law and Policy
Recommendations to improve food labelling law and policy in Australia and New Zealand are contained in a report presented to Federal, State and Territory Governments today.
Dr Neal Blewett, chair of the independent Review of Food Labelling Law and Policy, presented the report, ‘Labelling Logic’, to the Parliamentary Secretary for Health and Ageing, Catherine King.
Some of the key recommendations include:
- That information on food labels be presented in a clear and comprehensible manner to enhance understanding across all levels of the population.
- That the food safety elements on the food label be reviewed with the aim to maximise the effectiveness of food safety communication.
- That there be more effective monitoring and enforcement of the existing requirements in the Food Standards Code to provide mandatory warning and advisory statements and allergen declarations on packages of food not for retail sale, foods for sale at restaurants and other food outlets, foods from mobile food vendors and vending machines, and foods for catering purposes.
- That the Voluntary Incidental Trace Allergen Labelling system be explored as a possible supplementary model to manage food label declarations relating to the adventitious presence of allergens in foods.
- That where sugars, fats or vegetable oils are added as separate ingredients in a food, the terms ‘added sugars’ and ‘added fats’ and/or ‘added vegetable oils’ be used in the ingredient list as the generic term, followed by a bracketed list (e.g., added sugars (fructose, glucose syrup, honey), added fats (palm oil, milk fat) or added vegetable oils (sunflower oil, palm oil)).
- That mandatory declaration of all trans fatty acids above an agreed threshold be introduced in the Nutrition Information Panel if manufactured trans fatty acids have not been phased out of the food supply by January 2013.
- That declaration of total and naturally occurring fibre content be considered as a mandatory requirement in the Nutrition Information Panel.
- That declaration of energy content of standardised food items on the menu/menu boards or in close proximity to the food display or menu be mandatory in chain food service outlets and on vending machines. Further, information equivalent to that provided by the Nutrition Information Panel should be available in a readily accessible form in chain food service outlets.
New shed: Chip maker Snack Brands commits to growth plan with $400m supply chain spend
CHIPS company Snack Brands has committed to its growth plan, building a state-of-the-art automated w...
Metcash profits drop 20 per cent, CEO to retire
IGA independent supermarket supplier, Metcash, has reported a 20 per cent drop in profit after tax f...
Nestle aiming for 100% recyclable or reusable packaging by 2025
Nestle has announced it is aiming for all of its packaging to be either recyclable or reusable by 20...
Australian researchers discover asthma relief in fibre, fatty foods bad for asthma
New Australian research has found a surprising link between taking fibre supplements and treating as...
Australian brand takes home multiple medals from world’s largest cheese comp
A small independent Australian cheese producer has taken out multiple medals at the world’s largest ...
All the way from NZ, The Apple Press's newest Apple Juice is now available in Australia
The Apple Press is a New Zealander company based in Hawke's Bay. They are on a mission to bring wha...
Rockmelon grower cleared for production again after listeria outbreak
The grower linked to Australia’s recent rockmelon listeria outbreak has been cleared to recommence t...
Different food industry responses to Free Range Egg Farms misleading claim fine
Responses to last week’s Australian Federal Court’s decision to impose a $300, 000 penalty on Free R...
Nothing about Country of Origin and given that we share our labelling laws with NZ who have a Free Trade Agreement with China we do not know where the product is produced. The four global GM companies have been let off the hook yet again – their lobbyists must be laughing all the way to the bank.